apo
Demo · read-only
Sign in
Agent Testing
Tasks
Runs
Schedules
Observability
Traces
Toggle Sidebar
demo
Runs
Runs
demo-bch
real-agent/operations/log-analyzer
demo-run_e
Failed
real-agent/operations/log-analyzer
·
anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5
·
cli
·
8w ago
Details
▸
Task
Run
Trace home
Delete
33%
pass rate
2
passed
·
4
failed
·
6
checks
31.8s
duration
$0.0712
57.8k tok
—
reasoning
⚑ model drift — 8/9 gens
▸
run notices
Checks
6
Conversation History
Deliverables
Trace home
2
/6 passed
4 failed
Click to expand
✓
analyzed-access-log
✗
detected-planted-anomalies
expected expected finding: scanner IP findings include scanner IP; expected expected finding: scanner path /admin findings include scanner path /admin; expected expected finding: scanner path /.env findings include scanner path /.env; expected expected finding: scanner path /wp-admin findings include scanner path /wp-admin; expected expected finding: scanner user-agent findings include scanner user-agent; expected expected finding: 5xx errors findings include 5xx errors; expected expected finding: error endpoint /api/v2/orders findings include error endpoint /api/v2/orders; expected expected finding: error source IP findings include error source IP; expected expected finding: 429 rate-limit findings include 429 rate-limit; expected value at least 2 distinct findings
✗
identified-scanner-as-pattern
No values were provided to evaluate against the instruction. The instruction specifies criteria for passing or failing an analysis of scanner activity (IP 45.33.32.156 with specific probing patterns and python-requests user-agent), but no actual analysis or log data was submitted for evaluation. Without values to assess, I cannot determine whether the analysis identifies the coherent pattern of reconnaissance behavior or merely lists individual requests.
✗
contextualized-error-cluster
No analysis has been provided to evaluate. The instruction specifies criteria for passing evaluation: (1) identifying a cluster of 500/503 errors on POST /api/v2/orders from 10.0.0.51 as a service-level issue (not individual errors), AND (2) noting the 429 rate-limit response to the scanner IP as a separate signal. The instruction also specifies failure conditions: mentioning 5xx errors without identifying the endpoint pattern, or not flagging the 429. Since no actual analysis values were provided to evaluate against these criteria, I cannot determine if the pass/fail conditions are met.
✗
analysis-is-specific-and-actionable
No values were provided to evaluate against the instruction. The instruction specifies criteria for passing (specific data points with concrete numbers, IPs, endpoints, timestamps, and clear categorization) versus failing (generic findings without specifics). Without actual analysis content to review, I cannot assess whether it meets these requirements.
✓
log-file-present