apo
Demo · read-only
Sign in
Agent Testing
Tasks
Runs
Schedules
Observability
Traces
Toggle Sidebar
demo
Runs
Runs
demo-bch
real-agent/operations/log-analyzer
demo-run_d
Failed
real-agent/operations/log-analyzer
·
real-agent
·
Model
anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5
Effort
—
(reported by adapter)
·
cli
·
batch demo-bch
·
Aug 29, 2026, 03:19:16 PM
Task
Run
Trace home
Delete
33%
pass rate
2
passed
·
4
failed
·
6
checks
48.3s
duration
$0.2326
65.3k tok
real-agent
adapter
Checks
6
Conversation History
Deliverables
Trace home
2
/6 passed
4 failed
Click to expand
✓
analyzed-access-log
✗
detected-planted-anomalies
expected expected finding: scanner IP findings include scanner IP; expected expected finding: scanner path /admin findings include scanner path /admin; expected expected finding: scanner path /.env findings include scanner path /.env; expected expected finding: scanner path /wp-admin findings include scanner path /wp-admin; expected expected finding: scanner user-agent findings include scanner user-agent; expected expected finding: 5xx errors findings include 5xx errors; expected expected finding: error endpoint /api/v2/orders findings include error endpoint /api/v2/orders; expected expected finding: error source IP findings include error source IP; expected expected finding: 429 rate-limit findings include 429 rate-limit; expected value at least 2 distinct findings
✗
identified-scanner-as-pattern
The instruction requires identifying a specific pattern: IP 45.33.32.156 probing multiple suspicious paths (/admin, /admin/users, /.env, /wp-admin) with a python-requests user-agent, and characterizing this as reconnaissance/scanning behavior rather than just listing individual requests. No analysis or values are provided to evaluate against this instruction. Without any content to assess, I cannot determine if the pattern was identified and characterized appropriately or if it was merely listed without connection.
✗
contextualized-error-cluster
The instruction requires two specific elements to PASS: (1) identification of a cluster of 500/503 errors on POST /api/v2/orders from 10.0.0.51 as a service-level issue, and (2) noting the 429 rate-limit response to a scanner IP as a separate signal. However, no values or analysis have been provided to evaluate. Without any content to assess, I cannot determine if these requirements are met. The evaluation requires actual log data or analysis to be present.
✗
analysis-is-specific-and-actionable
The value provided is a token budget specification (1000000) rather than an analysis with data points, status codes, IPs, endpoints, or categorized findings. It contains no traffic analysis, no concrete numbers related to requests, no IP addresses, no endpoint breakdowns, no timestamps, and no categorization of normal traffic, anomalies, attacks, or errors. This is simply a configuration parameter, not an analysis document.
✓
log-file-present